Socio-legal international law and human rights scholar

Viktoriia
Olexandra
Hamaiunova

Socio-legal international law and human rights scholar specialising in mediation, civil justice systems, legal culture, and the right to a fair trial.

Portrait of Viktoriia Olexandra Hamaiunova

Her work combines comparative doctrinal analysis with empirical socio-legal methods, including elite interviews with ECtHR judges, and has been published in peer-reviewed journals, with further dissemination through international conferences, invited talks, policy-facing work, and an interview.

01 / Research portfolio

Research
projects.

Current research examines how mediation reshapes fair-trial guarantees in Europe and develops a new strand on bureaucratisation, intelligibility, and AI in justice systems.

01

Rights-Compatible Procedural Vitality in Public and Corporate Remedy Systems

To examine how formally compliant mediation, grievance and integrity procedures may retain visible safeguards while losing their practical capacity to sustain meaningful voice, contestability, professional judgement, effective remedy and institutional learning. The project develops a transferable…

Explore projectClose project+

Core aims

+

To examine how formally compliant mediation, grievance and integrity procedures may retain visible safeguards while losing their practical capacity to sustain meaningful voice, contestability, professional judgement, effective remedy and institutional learning. The project develops a transferable rights-based framework for identifying procedural ritualisation across public hybrid justice and corporate accountability systems. It also examines how AI-supported intake, classification, summarisation, drafting and review may either preserve or weaken procedural fairness and meaningful human oversight.

A dedicated strand addresses feedback vitality in remedy and ADR systems: how feedback mechanisms (intake, screening, closing documents, AI-assisted summarisation and post-process loops) themselves risk ritualisation — producing formally compliant outputs while failing to elicit honest, detailed input, preserve party voice or support institutional learning. The project integrates insights from dialogic feedback pedagogy and counter-design approaches to diagnose when feedback processes shift from developmental and relational to closure-oriented and performative.

Methods

+

Comparative socio-legal and doctrinal analysis of mediation, grievance and integrity mechanisms; analysis of procedural rules, institutional guidance, templates, screening and intake materials, reporting practices, closing documents, feedback loops and AI governance policies; selected case studies in family and court-connected mediation and corporate remedy systems; and validation through expert consultation and practitioner engagement.

The project builds on the distinction between visible and implicit legal culture developed in the applicant’s earlier research on mediation, institutional design and Article 6 ECHR. It operationalises three integrated diagnostic lenses:

Meaning–Form Gap Check (language and documentation — whether aspirational language of voice, participation and remedy is displaced by closure- and compliance-oriented language in templates, AI outputs and closing documents)

Discretion Window (organisational conditions enabling or constraining professional judgement in atypical or high-stakes cases)

AI Cognitive Allocation Map (which cognitive and relational functions are reallocated to AI and with what consequences for trust, nuance, contestability and human oversight).

A cross-cutting Feedback Vitality lens examines feedback mechanisms themselves as sites of potential ritualisation, assessing question design, timing, affective dimensions, analysis for institutional learning versus case closure, and safeguards against AI-induced flattening of voice.

Academic Publications

+
Linguistic Risks of Bureaucracy in Family Mediation and Guardrails for AI UseView
(in press) Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. “Linguistic Risks of Bureaucracy in Family Mediation and Guardrails for AI Use.” In: International Handbook of Legal Language and Communication: From Text to Semiotics, Section 35 (Springer, forthcoming).
Examination of procedural ritualisation and the divergence between formal institutional design and substantive procedural function, with particular attention to feedback mechanisms in hybrid justice and corporate remedy systemsView
(conceptual article in development) Examination of procedural ritualisation and the divergence between formal institutional design and substantive procedural function, with particular attention to feedback mechanisms in hybrid justice and corporate remedy systems.
Development and validation of a rights-compatible framework for assessing procedural vitality in public and corporate remedy systems, integrating Meaning–Form Gap Check, Discretion Window, AI Cognitive Allocation Map and Feedback Vitality lensView
(methodological article in development) Development and validation of a rights-compatible framework for assessing procedural vitality in public and corporate remedy systems, integrating Meaning–Form Gap Check, Discretion Window, AI Cognitive Allocation Map and Feedback Vitality lens.
AI-supported grievance, compliance and early resolution processes, with particular attention to source contact, contestability, professional judgement, human oversight and feedback vitalityView
(applied article in development) AI-supported grievance, compliance and early resolution processes, with particular attention to source contact, contestability, professional judgement, human oversight and feedback vitality.
Ritualisation, Hybrid Justice and AI-Supported Procedural Governance: Diagnostic Lenses for Voice, Remedy and Institutional LearningView
(book project in development) Ritualisation, Hybrid Justice and AI-Supported Procedural Governance: Diagnostic Lenses for Voice, Remedy and Institutional Learning.

Invited and Featured Talks

+
Procedural Vitality in Justice and Grievance SystemsView
“Procedural Vitality in Justice and Grievance Systems” (research presentation at Oxford AI Build Club, as part of AI Exploration Week, University of Oxford, 10 July 2026).
Ritual or Real Remedy? Diagnostic Lenses for Assessing Procedural Vitality in Alternative Dispute ResolutionView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, “Ritual or Real Remedy? Diagnostic Lenses for Assessing Procedural Vitality in Alternative Dispute Resolution”, featured speaker, 12th International Training Workshop on “Emerging Global Practices in Arbitration & Mediation”, Saarosh ADR Center and Saarosh International Arbitration & Mediation Institute, 29 June 2026.
Global Voices on IntegrityView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, special guest speaker, “Global Voices on Integrity”, Operation Zero Bribe initiative, online, 14 December 2025.

Professional and Knowledge-Exchange Applications

+

Research-led professional training and institutional diagnostic products that translate the Rights-Compatible Procedural Vitality Toolkit into practitioner-facing tools. All products are positioned as second-order diagnostic instruments that can be used alongside existing compliance frameworks. They focus on identifying when procedures and feedback mechanisms appear formally sound but have lost substantive capacity for voice, contestability, meaningful remedy and institutional learning — with particular relevance to early resolution models, court-connected and pre-court ADR, grievance mechanisms and AI-supported workflows.

Diagnostic Products

+
Rights-Compatible Procedural Vitality Quick ScanView
Rights-Compatible Procedural Vitality Quick Scan — document-based review of one grievance, complaint or operational-level remedy pathway, assessing whether the mechanism retains real procedural vitality or has become ritualised (voice, challenge, remedy vs formal compliance and efficient case closure). Applies the full set of lenses including Feedback Vitality. Deliverables: 8–12-page diagnostic memo + risk map + recommendations table + feedback call.
Feedback Vitality Quick ScanView
Feedback Vitality Quick Scan — targeted review of feedback mechanisms within grievance, speak-up, mediation or ADR pathways. Examines whether feedback elicits honest and detailed input, preserves party voice and informed consent, supports institutional learning rather than closure, and avoids ritualisation through checkbox design, end-of-process timing or AI summarisation that flattens nuance. Integrates Meaning–Form Gap Check (language in feedback/closing documents), Discretion Window and AI Cognitive Allocation Map. Deliverables: diagnostic memo + risk map + recommendations for question design, timing, analysis protocols and safeguards.
Speak-Up & Integrity Vitality ReviewView
Speak-Up & Integrity Vitality Review — diagnostic review of whistleblowing, speak-up and integrity reporting channels, identifying gaps between formal policy and lived experience of voice, non-retaliation and institutional learning.
AI Cognitive Allocation ReviewView
AI Cognitive Allocation Review — targeted mapping of where AI enters complaint, grievance, mediation or compliance workflows and assessment of whether it preserves or displaces source contact, contestability, professional judgement and meaningful human oversight.
Mediation Template & Safeguards ReviewView
Mediation Template & Safeguards Review — review of mediation templates, intake/screening forms, consent documents and AI-assisted drafting/feedback practices, assessing impact on party voice, informed consent, vulnerability protection and mediator discretion.

Professional Training (CPD) Portfolio

+

All courses are developed as practitioner-facing outputs from the Rights-Compatible Procedural Vitality Toolkit and Feedback Vitality strand. They translate diagnostic frameworks into actionable training for mediators, complaint handlers, compliance professionals and institutional designers.

AI-Supported Mediation and Complaint Handling: Safeguarding Voice, Confidentiality and Human JudgementView
AI-Supported Mediation and Complaint Handling: Safeguarding Voice, Confidentiality and Human Judgement — examines how AI tools in intake, classification, summarisation, drafting and reporting may displace source contact, contestability and professional judgement; practical exercises using the AI Cognitive Allocation Map and Meaning–Form Gap instruments.
Mediation Templates, Vulnerability Screening and AI Drafting: Guardrails for Party Voice and Procedural IntegrityView
Mediation Templates, Vulnerability Screening and AI Drafting: Guardrails for Party Voice and Procedural Integrity — analyses risks of ritualisation arising from over-standardised documents and AI-generated texts; application of Meaning–Form Gap Check and Discretion Window instruments, with attention to vulnerability screening and child-centred reasoning.
Designing Effective Feedback Systems in Grievance, ADR & Integrity Mechanisms: From Ritual to Vitality (new)View
Designing Effective Feedback Systems in Grievance, ADR & Integrity Mechanisms: From Ritual to Vitality (new) — practical training on question design, timing, structured reflection and analysis protocols that elicit honest, detailed feedback and support institutional learning rather than case closure. Integrates Inclusive Dialogic Feedback Model with Vitality lenses; includes guardrails against AI-induced flattening and defensive professional practice. Target audience: mediators, complaint handlers, compliance/HR teams, BHR and integrity practitioners.
Grievance Mechanisms That Deliver Effective Remedy: Diagnosing Ritualisation in Formal Compliance SystemsView
Grievance Mechanisms That Deliver Effective Remedy: Diagnosing Ritualisation in Formal Compliance Systems — full diagnostic toolkit application with emphasis on remedy vs closure and institutional learning loops.
Speak-Up Channels and Procedural Trust: From Formal Policy to Systems That Sustain Voice and Institutional LearningView
Speak-Up Channels and Procedural Trust: From Formal Policy to Systems That Sustain Voice and Institutional Learning — diagnosis of visible–implicit gaps in integrity systems, with attention to retaliation risk as a design issue and feedback loops.
Procedural Vitality in Hybrid Justice and Corporate Remedy SystemsView
Procedural Vitality in Hybrid Justice and Corporate Remedy Systems — comparative and conceptual application of the complete diagnostic framework (including Feedback Vitality) across mediation, early resolution models and corporate grievance mechanisms.

Knowledge-Exchange and Practitioner Engagement

+

The framework and products are designed for direct application in live policy and practice contexts, including engagement with early resolution models (e.g., OPRC Pre-Action Model and pre-court ADR schemes), whistleblowing early resolution initiatives and personal injury two-tier pre-court ADR development. Activities include scoping notes, evaluation frameworks for mediation uptake and quality (beyond settlement rates), feedback vitality assessments in specific schemes, and contribution to stakeholder consultations on user voice, contestability and meaningful human oversight in AI-supported and standardised processes.

02

New Institutional Approach on Right to a Fair Trial in the Context of Article 6 ECHR: Mediation as Court and Court as Mediation

To explain how the institutional integration of mediation into judicial systems reshapes the contemporary meaning of the right to a fair trial under Article 6 ECHR, and to identify the criteria and tests used (and missing) when assessing fairness in civil proceedings in systems combining adjudication and…

Explore projectClose project+

Core aims

+

To explain how the institutional integration of mediation into judicial systems reshapes the contemporary meaning of the right to a fair trial under Article 6 ECHR, and to identify the criteria and tests used (and missing) when assessing fairness in civil proceedings in systems combining adjudication and court-connected mediation.

Methods

+

Doctrinal analysis of ECtHR jurisprudence on Article 6 ECHR; comparative and historical socio-legal analysis of civil justice and mediation across selected Council of Europe member states; and an empirical component using semi‑structured elite interviews with ECtHR judges. The project develops an institution-centred comparative framework (seven-criteria grid) for analysing adjudication, mediation, and hybrid procedural designs.

Funding and Fellowships

+
Max Planck Society Scholarship (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security, and Law, Freiburg, Germany)View
Max Planck Society Scholarship (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security, and Law, Freiburg, Germany) — €5,460.
Northern Bridge Consortium Funding (Wordsworth Grasmere, Lake District, UK)View
Northern Bridge Consortium Funding (Wordsworth Grasmere, Lake District, UK) — £500.
Doctoral College Enhancement Funding (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; two awards)View
Doctoral College Enhancement Funding (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; two awards) — £3,000.
ESRC Impact Acceleration Account Funding (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)View
ESRC Impact Acceleration Account Funding (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) — £1,500.
European Court of Human Rights Traineeship Funding (Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France)View
European Court of Human Rights Traineeship Funding (Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France) — €3,000.
Doctoral College Internship Fund (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)View
Doctoral College Internship Fund (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) — £1,500.
Active Study Funding Support (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)View
Active Study Funding Support (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) — £500.
The Law School’s PGR Conference Fund (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; three awards)View
The Law School’s PGR Conference Fund (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; three awards) — £1,000.

Academic Publications

+
From Custom to Court: The Evolution of Mediation in European Legal SystemsView
Hamaiunova, Viktoriia (2026). From Custom to Court: The Evolution of Mediation in European Legal Systems. Conflict Resolution Quarterly.
https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.70035View
Mediation on a Global Spectrum: Balancing Autonomy, Mandatory Frameworks, and Evolving Judicial RolesView
Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. "Mediation on a Global Spectrum: Balancing Autonomy, Mandatory Frameworks, and Evolving Judicial Roles." NEL Rev. 11 (2025): 74.
https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/neastlr11&id=76&collection=journals&index=View
Influence of Implicit and Visible Legal Cultures on Modernisation of Judicial Systems in European Countries. Athens Journal of Law. Oct 4, 2023. https://www.athensjournals.gr/law/2023-9-4-9-Hamaiunova.pdfView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova. Influence of Implicit and Visible Legal Cultures on Modernisation of Judicial Systems in European Countries. Athens Journal of Law. Oct 4, 2023. https://www.athensjournals.gr/law/2023-9-4-9-Hamaiunova.pdf
Confidentiality v Public Hearing under Article 6 ECHR: Mediation’s Impact on the Fair-Trial ParadigmView
(forthcoming) Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. “Confidentiality v Public Hearing under Article 6 ECHR: Mediation’s Impact on the Fair-Trial Paradigm.” Revised manuscript under review, Nordic Journal of Human Rights. Journal page: https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rnhr20
Four Faces of Civil ProcedureView
(abstract accepted; chapter submitted for review) Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. “Four Faces of Civil Procedure.” In: International Handbook of Legal Language and Communication: From Text to Semiotics, Section 29: Comparative Legal Systems – Institutional Structures and Functional Approaches (Springer, forthcoming). Project website: https://meteor.springer.com/ihllc
Hybrid Courts and Judicial Boundary Work: Settlement Pressure and the Governable Periphery of AdjudicationView
(submitted) Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. “Hybrid Courts and Judicial Boundary Work: Settlement Pressure and the Governable Periphery of Adjudication.” Manuscript under review, Law & Society Review, submitted June 2026. Journal page: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-society-review
Studying Implicit Legal Culture through Elite Judicial Interviews: A Socio-Legal Method for Analysing Fair Trial under Article 6 ECHRView
(article in development; working title) Viktoriia Hamaiunova. Studying Implicit Legal Culture through Elite Judicial Interviews: A Socio-Legal Method for Analysing Fair Trial under Article 6 ECHR
Can Mediation Be a Mode of Exercising the Right to a Fair Trial under Article 6 ECHRView
(article in development; working title) Viktoriia Hamaiunova. Can Mediation Be a Mode of Exercising the Right to a Fair Trial under Article 6 ECHR
A Seven-Criteria Framework for Comparing Adjudication, Mediation, and Hybrid Civil JusticeView
(article in development; working title) Viktoriia Hamaiunova. A Seven-Criteria Framework for Comparing Adjudication, Mediation, and Hybrid Civil Justice
Fair Trial Beyond the Courtroom: Hybrid Civil Justice in EuropeView
(book project / monograph in development; working title) Viktoriia Hamaiunova. Fair Trial Beyond the Courtroom: Hybrid Civil Justice in Europe

Conference Papers

+
Mediation, Legal Culture, and the Evolutive Interpretation of Article 6 ECHR: Reimagining the Rule of Law in an Era of Legal and Geopolitical TransformationView
Mediation, Legal Culture, and the Evolutive Interpretation of Article 6 ECHR: Reimagining the Rule of Law in an Era of Legal and Geopolitical Transformation — Pre-Annual Conference Workshop (ESIL IG on International Environmental Law & ESIL IG on European and International Rule of Law), Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, 11 Sep 2025.
Exploring the Impact of Mediation Integration on Fair Trials: A Critical Analysis of Article 6 of the ECHR, The SLSA Annual Conference, 26th-28th March 2024, PortsmouthView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, Exploring the Impact of Mediation Integration on Fair Trials: A Critical Analysis of Article 6 of the ECHR, The SLSA Annual Conference, 26th-28th March 2024, Portsmouth
Visible and Implicit Legal Cultures of ECtHR Countries, the 20th Annual International Conference on Law, hosted by Athens Institute for Education and Research, 10-13 July, 2023, AthensView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, Visible and Implicit Legal Cultures of ECtHR Countries, the 20th Annual International Conference on Law, hosted by Athens Institute for Education and Research, 10-13 July, 2023, Athens
Equalising Power in Mediation, the Queen Mary Law Doctoral Conference 2023, 22-23 June, LondonView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, Equalising Power in Mediation, the Queen Mary Law Doctoral Conference 2023, 22-23 June, London
Potential Risks of Violation of Article 6 of the ECHR in connection with the Integration of Mediation into the Judicial System, SLSA Annual Conference 2023, Derry-Londonderry, 4 to 6 AprilView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, Potential Risks of Violation of Article 6 of the ECHR in connection with the Integration of Mediation into the Judicial System, SLSA Annual Conference 2023, Derry-Londonderry, 4 to 6 April
Evolution of Article 6 of the ECHR in Connection with the Integration of Mediation into the Judicial Systems of the ECtHR Countries. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Research in Social Sciences, 2023. Barcelona, Spain ISBN: 978-609-485-382-1 Date: 17th February 2023 URL: https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/02-19007.pdfView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova Evolution of Article 6 of the ECHR in Connection with the Integration of Mediation into the Judicial Systems of the ECtHR Countries. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Research in Social Sciences, 2023. Barcelona, Spain ISBN: 978-609-485-382-1 Date: 17th February 2023 URL: https://www.dpublication.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/02-19007.pdf
The Social Turn in Contemporary ResearchView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova. The Role of Article 6 of the ECHR in connection with the Integration of Mediation into the Judicial System: Newcastle University HASS First Year PGR Conference “The Social Turn in Contemporary Research”, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 08.06.2022.

Internal and Invited Research Seminars/Talks

+
INTERNAL & INVITED RESEARCH SEMINARS/TALKSView
INTERNAL & INVITED RESEARCH SEMINARS/TALKS
Potential Risks of Violation of Article 6 ECHR in connection with the Integration of Mediation into the Judicial SystemView
Newcastle Law School – “Potential Risks of Violation of Article 6 ECHR in connection with the Integration of Mediation into the Judicial System”, PGR Research Seminar Series, 14 Jun 2022, Newcastle University – 60-min seminar + Q&A.
03

Human-Rights Limits in Mandatory Mediation: Normative Frameworks of ADR

To define the human-rights limits of mandatory or court-connected mediation and propose rights-compatible guardrails for designing “mandatory” schemes without hollowing out autonomy, access to court, procedural fairness, and protection of vulnerable parties.

Explore projectClose project+

Core aims

+

To define the human-rights limits of mandatory or court-connected mediation and propose rights-compatible guardrails for designing “mandatory” schemes without hollowing out autonomy, access to court, procedural fairness, and protection of vulnerable parties.

Methods

+

Comparative doctrinal analysis of mandatory mediation architectures; normative legal analysis of autonomy, consent and coercion; and structured comparison of jurisdictional models and judicial roles in mediation/ADR.

Funding

+
The Law School’s PGR Conference Fund (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; three awards)View
The Law School’s PGR Conference Fund (Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; three awards) — £500.

Academic Publications

+
The genie of autonomy: steering mandatory mediation within human-rights limitsView
Hamaiunova, V. (2026). The genie of autonomy: steering mandatory mediation within human-rights limits. The International Journal of Human Rights, 30(4), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2025.2569345
Balancing Justice: Mandatory Mediation and Human Rights Principles in Evolving Legal Landscapes Mediation Theory and Practice, 9(1), 71-88View
Hamaiunova, Viktoriia (2025). Balancing Justice: Mandatory Mediation and Human Rights Principles in Evolving Legal Landscapes Mediation Theory and Practice, 9(1), 71-88. https://mediationpublishing.com/products/balancing-justice-mandatory-mediation-and-human-rights-principles-in-evolving-legal-landscapes?_pos=1&_psq=balancing&_ss=e&_v=1.0

Interviews

+
Recalibrating Autonomy: Human Rights and the Design of Court-Connected MediationView
Faculti. (2025). “Recalibrating Autonomy: Human Rights and the Design of Court-Connected Mediation.” Interview with Viktoriia Hamaiunova. https://doi.org/10.64240/093378bd22 Publisher: Faculti Media Limited.

Conference Papers

+
Compatibility of Mandatory Judicial Mediation with Human Rights Principles, Human Rights Law: Prospects, Possibilities, Fears and Limitations European Human Rights Law Conference 2023, 28-29 September 2023, hosted by University of CambridgeView
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, Compatibility of Mandatory Judicial Mediation with Human Rights Principles, Human Rights Law: Prospects, Possibilities, Fears and Limitations European Human Rights Law Conference 2023, 28-29 September 2023, hosted by University of Cambridge
04

Inclusive Dialogic Feedback and Scalable Assessment in Higher Education

feedback, inclusion, and structural justice in higher education. It examines how scalable feedback practices in mass postgraduate education can be redesigned without collapsing into mechanisation, exclusion, or pedagogically thin models of assessment. The project critically engages with four leading feedback…

Explore projectClose project+

Project overview

+

feedback, inclusion, and structural justice in higher education. It examines how scalable feedback practices in mass postgraduate education can be redesigned without collapsing into mechanisation, exclusion, or pedagogically thin models of assessment. The project critically engages with four leading feedback frameworks — Assessment for Inclusion, Learning Analytics, Dialogic Feedback Pedagogy, and Coaching Dialogue — and develops an Inclusive Dialogic Feedback Model intended to combine dialogic practice, ethical depth, and institutional scalability.

Academic Publications

+
Scaling Dialogic Feedback Inclusively: Rethinking Scalable Assessment through Inclusive Design, Feedback Literacy and Counter-DesignView
(under review) Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. “Scaling Dialogic Feedback Inclusively: Rethinking Scalable Assessment through Inclusive Design, Feedback Literacy and Counter-Design.” Manuscript submitted to Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Taylor & Francis / Routledge, 15 June 2026. Article type: Research Article. Submission ID: 266287710. Current status: Manuscript Submitted. https://rp.tandfonline.com/dashboard/

Conference Papers

+
Scaling Dialogic Feedback Inclusively: Rethinking Scalable Assessment through Inclusive Design, Dialogic Practice, and Structural Critique, Graduate/Post-doc Students Teaching in Higher Education Conference: Empowering the Next Generation of Educators, 8 August 2025, Online (organised by ITeach: Certification in Higher Ed Inc, iteachhe.com)View
Viktoriia Hamaiunova, Scaling Dialogic Feedback Inclusively: Rethinking Scalable Assessment through Inclusive Design, Dialogic Practice, and Structural Critique, Graduate/Post-doc Students Teaching in Higher Education Conference: Empowering the Next Generation of Educators, 8 August 2025, Online (organised by ITeach: Certification in Higher Ed Inc, iteachhe.com).

Teaching-Related Media and Curriculum Contributions

+
SIMByte Teaching Moments Video Series, Academy of Management, Social Issues in Management Division, 2025–2026 SIM Curriculum CommitteeView
(forthcoming) Hamaiunova, V. (Writer & Speaker) & Mukhopadhyay, M. (Video Editor) (2026). SIMByte Teaching Moments Video Series, Academy of Management, Social Issues in Management Division, 2025–2026 SIM Curriculum Committee.
05

Collaborative Research

Collaborative outputs

Explore projectClose project+

Academic Publications

+
The Singapore Convention: Five Years OnView
Clark & Hamaiunova, The Singapore Convention: Five Years On (in press, 2026; Clark, Bryan; Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. “The Singapore Convention: Five Years On”. In Masood Ahmed; David Sixsmith (eds), The Place of Mediation within the Modern Civil Justice System: Critical Perspectives, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, in press (publication date: 31 Mar 2026). Preprint available on SSRN (Date Written: 18 Sep 2024; Posted: 29 Oct 2024). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4961421.
Harnessing the Sun: Role of State Action Plan on Climate Change and Tech-Driven Solutions for Solar Energy Sector in the Indian States of Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, and AssamView
Saraswat, Ashish; Tiwari, Garima; Hamaiunova, Viktoriia. (2025). “Harnessing the Sun: Role of State Action Plan on Climate Change and Tech-Driven Solutions for Solar Energy Sector in the Indian States of Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, and Assam.” In Zahir Khan, R.; Abdul Razak, L.; Premaratne, G. (eds), Green Management and Technology-Driven Firm Performance (Springer Nature).
To the Question about Theoretical and Worldview Principals of Environmental Mediation in Legal Educational AspectView
Kovalenko I.I.; Hamaiunova V.O. (2016). “To the Question about Theoretical and Worldview Principals of Environmental Mediation in Legal Educational Aspect.” Вісник національного університету Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого. Серія: Філософія, №1 (28), 128–135.

Policy Papers

+
Future Resilience of the European Technology SecurityView
De Vera, Miguel; Hamaiunova, Viktoriia; Koleszár, Réka; Pasquettaz, Giada. (2024). “Future Resilience of the European Technology Security.” Policy Papers, European Center for Populism Studies (ECPS), 4 Nov 2024. DOI: 10.55271/pop0004.

Complete profile

Overview first.
Details on demand.

02

Experience

03

Teaching

04

Education & Training

05

Publications & Forthcoming

06

Talks & Conferences

07

Grants

08

Memberships

09

Skills

10

Languages

11

References

Contact

Viktoriia Olexandra
Hamaiunova